Jason Williams answers Reddit AMA

A couple of weeks ago I posted about an upcoming Reddit AMA (Ask Me Anything) Q&A that Jason Williams was planning to do with r/il2sturmovik. Jason’s now had a chance to read through and answer many of the questions that came up during the AMA and I highly recommend checking them out.

Some key highlights

I don’t want to steal the thunder from the Reddit group but I did want to reproduce a few highlights from the AMA that I think will really interest readers and then encourage you to visit the AMA answers from there.

Question: What are the plans to increase the very limiting 9.6k render distance? As planes increase in power and speed, being able to see farther and farther is more than important; it’s necessary.

Jason: We already cheat to make planes more visible at that distance. To go further we’d need to implement some kind of graphical tweak and adjust many other areas like AI and physics etc. to make planes exist physically at longer distances. We’ve discussed it many times, but it requires a fair amount of work from our lead programmer who as you will see, shoulders most of the burden. And with modern monitors you end up simply running out of pixels and things devolve into dots and how we deal with those dots becomes and issue that takes time to do. So, my best answer is, we are well aware of the community’s desire to somehow increase your visual awareness of planes beyond 10km. It’s high on my list to tackle once we have a free moment to do it.

This is an issue that keeps coming up and it matters to some people more than to others. Beyond about 10km (9.6km apparently) rendering of objects stops and that tends to make it difficult to pick out aircraft at longer distances and perhaps more importantly is a challenge to high altitude bombers.

It’s particularly bad for higher altitude bombers as targets will pop in much closer than 10km in a straight line as the altitude and the circumference of the render bubble cause these objects to appear well into the bomb run making last minute adjustments difficult if not impossible.

It’s not an issue with an easy solution but it’s nice to know that the team has it on the radar.

Question: What kind of cooperation between Tank players and plane players do you envision for the game? Eg.: will planes spot enemy tanks, or tanks be able to request air support to deal with a particular target?

Jason: When we have the Marshal feature implemented I envision such complex scenarios in multiplayer for sure. For single-player such a feature is harder to make obviously, but it would be cool. We do envision battles with ground objectives being supported by air power. That’s the whole point of letting our tanks play with airplanes. The Po-2 which is deep into development should be good fun in directing the battle from the air acting as an airborne observation post.

I’ve been going on about this sort of thing for a while but I thought this was a good one to hear “from the horses mouth” so to speak. The idea of implementing Tank Crew and making combined arms more a part of the IL-2 experience than before is one that interests me greatly. I think it will be a boon to multiplayer in particular and help evolve the series in some new and interesting ways.


I also think it’s a great mention of the third party Po-2 and how that aircraft can interact in the multiplayer scene. The Po-2 is currently in development and expected to arrive sometime in the autumn.

Question: Can you give us a rough estimate of what planes are coming up? Obviously the 190A/F-8 just dropped and the P-47 is next, but are there any aircraft that are proving to be particularly challenging?

Jason: I don’t have the entire schedule in front of me, but I know the Me-262 will be last to be finished thanks to having to build a jet FM to support higher Mach numbers. The Tempest cockpit is turning out to not be so easy to find good references on since there appears to not be any surviving examples in museums. Again, correct me if I am wrong.

People are frequently wondering and asking which aircraft are next and what the schedule is looking like. We don’t know what the schedule is right now but we know that the P-47 is likely to be the next aircraft to arrive on the scene and now we know that the Me 262 jet fighter will likely be last in the schedule and that the Tempest V is proving to be difficult to find cockpit resources for.

Read the rest

I definitely encourage you to visit the r/il2sturmovik Reddit and read the rest of the answers. Jason talks about everything from the Pacific to the types of aircraft that he and the team would like to see (Hurricane is of interest). Jason even muses about what types of aircraft/theatre he’d love to do if money were no object.

Read it all right here.

10 Comments Add yours

  1. Trudy says:

    Its a good Q&A. Too bad I missed this. I really wanted to know, what plans for new collector aircrafts they had. Especially at the western front in 1944 and beyond were so many great aircrafts.
    Did anybody else make a list in his mind too, to set up a good bunch of new aircrafts? 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Francesco Kasta says:

      Mine would be: pretty much anything that flies! What’s your list?


      1. Trudy says:

        “Anything that flies”? That might be a long list.
        Well, yes, the very most aircrafts would be interesting in one or another way but the late western front offers a more diverse accumulation of high-performing aircrafts. One both sides. So there should be a much bigger potential for collector planes and not benefiting from this would be a great pity.


      2. Francesco Kasta says:

        Well, first and foremost if we are talking about late war high-performance aircrafts I’d say we need a “Mark XIV” with the mighty Griffon.

        The classic allied medium and light bombers like the “B-25, B-26, A-26 and A-20G” would be a nice fit for the map/era of Bodenplatte and so would be the “Mosquito” and the “Beaufighter.” Perhaps the “Ar 234” for ze German side.

        Personally I would be interested in earlier variants like the P-51C / Mustang III and the P-47 Razorback but they wouldn’t really fit the scenario unfortunately.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Francesco Kasta says:

        …and the Typhoon.

        Liked by 1 person

      4. ShamrockOneFive says:

        I think Francesco has covered my list well.

        There have been lengthy discussions on the IL-2 forums about aircraft such as the Spitfire XIV and Typhoon. We’ve also talked about the A-20G, A-26, Ar234, Mosquito, etc. All of these would definitely fit into the Bodenplatte tactical scenario and be plenty relevant.

        My hope is that we will see a few more aircraft become available via the Collector Plane system before they switch to something else. We’re still many months away from that but I love the enthusiasm.

        Liked by 1 person

      5. Trudy says:

        Yes, SpitXIV, Typhoon, Beaufighter, Ar234 are some of those I was thinking about. And so many more. For example the Me 163 and especially the Ta152. The Ta is what I wish more than any other aircraft. I guess we’re building cloud castles but its some kinda painful fun to muse about thinks, which are not likely to happen.

        Liked by 1 person

      6. Francesco Kasta says:

        …How could I forget the Ta 152 ?!

        Liked by 1 person

  2. pappanix says:

    I’ve been reading this websites for a couples of months now. It’s superlative!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ShamrockOneFive says:

      Thanks for the kind words! Stop by any time! 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s