Many of you have expressed your concerns about the future of the IL-2 Great Battles Series and today we’ve received a small update on what the team are doing and how things are looking for the future. That is coupled together with the release of a documentary that looks 8-years back at the start of the Great Battles series.

Serious Games documentary

The first thing we have to report on is the Series Games documentary about the making of IL-2 Sturmovik. The series was filmed back in 2015 by director Andrei Samoteikin. Apparently it saw limited distribution at that point. Only just now is being released to a wider audience.

Together with the announcement we get a quote from Albert Zhiltsov, CEO of 1C Game Studios, talking about the documentary series.

“IL-2 is a game that always had some true romantics as its developers. It’s not just a game, but a fully-fledged flight training simulator. Only those who are truly dedicated to their craft could create something like this. I hope that seeing myself and the rest of our team as we were 8 years ago will be interesting, not just for myself, but to all the fans of our series.”

Albert Zhiltsov, CEO of 1C Game Studios

I’ve only had a chance to watch the first few minutes so far but it is nostalgic for me to see Oleg Maddox, the name behind the very beginning of the IL-2 Sturmovik series, getting some screen time right from the start.

This documentary I suspect would feel more relevant had it actually released more widely in 2015. The scope of the game has changed and I suspect many fan’s investment with the series has changed over the course of the last several years too.

If you are interested in following the rest of the series, 5 episodes are planned with the first one out today and then the remaining four coming out every week until October 20th.

  • Episode 1 — September 22, 2023 
  • Episode 2 — September 29, 2023
  • Episode 3 — October 6, 2023
  • Episode 4 — October 13, 2023
  • Episode 5 — October 20, 2023
     

A word on the next steps in the series

A frequent concern among many readers here and in the community in general remains what is happening with the IL-2 Sturmovik series. We’ve, of course, just seen the big announcement from Team Fusion Simulations today so we know that that corner of the franchise is definitely moving forward. So, what about Great Battles?

Well we have a response to that in a post made by LukeFF on the official forums and quoting Daniil Tuseev (aka Han), IL-2’s producer. Here’s the quote:

Hello. The reason for the silence is simple – we do not want to give any promises or make any announces on something that we have no 100% ensure it is doable and will be released. We have had such mistakes before with “Marshall” and “Fuel systems” and we don’t want to repeat those mistakes. The next project has been in development for a year already and development is going according to plan. Many fabulous technologies are done already and now content development is in progress. And this new content has brand-new quality standards. But the time period of the war which will be simulated, main game mode features, a long list of new features in airplane systems and damage simulation, and new ammunition – these aspects of the new project in development but details are not established for 100%. And you will ask us about them in the next hour after the announcement.

So we will announce when everything will be established in the new project design and we will be sure everything we announce is doable. What I can assure you right now – a year ago we planned to double the power of the team that works on the new IL-2 in a year. And now, after a year, this objective is completed and the reinforced team is fully ahead to our main objective – the new IL-2 release. Everything we have planned for the first year is done. And this year – is a significant part of the development timeline which it’s not too long in total. So we are strongly sure that the new sim will be completed in time.

Daniil Tuseev (aka Han)

Unsurprisingly, there is something in the works and together with this and past statements about the increasing size of the team, it does reconfirm that things are in the works but that they are not ready to talk about it. This is a challenging position as we’ve had a near constant feed of information for several years up until this year and I know that has many of you concerned and looking at other experiences.

Lots of us have guesses on what this new project is. I maintain that a logical course of action would be to go and do the Korean War but we’ll see what they ultimately announce when that time comes.

I suspect that the timelines for the already announced additional Great Battles content, stretching into mid 2024, gives us a sense on where they expect to wrap up development and then begin talking about the new series. The WACO CG-4A, La-5 Series 38, Ta152, I-153 and Spitfire IXc are all expected between now and then together with a lengthier list of WWI types.

More on all of this as it develops!


21 responses to “A documentary about the IL-2 Great Battles series and next title message”

  1. [quote] and you will ask us about them in the next hour after the announcement.[/quote]

    Ah, I see they know us…

    Liked by 2 people

    1. LOL yes! 😊

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Look, I understand the difficulty in announcing something and then having to manage expectations. But to announce nothing because you are afraid is by far the worst course of action you could take. Everything they have officially communicated so far has really just said “We aren’t really working on anything.” Their senior engineer and main product line manager have left the series.

    Most of the time, when the community is upset, it’s because of a lack of communication. They mention the marshall and fuel systems as being sore points? I still don’t even know what Marshall was supposed to be!? Just say it was an experiment, and it didn’t pan out, and then we will move on.

    The sad thing is, this stuff isn’t even that hard. There will always been vocal people who complain about everything, but the solution isn’t to completely shut up. Regular open communication is a boon to a consumer focused company.

    Like

    1. In my communications playbook I’d definitely opt for more communication than less. Even when plans change, if there’s cohesive reasons for it, I think you get most people’s buy in for doing the best possible with the resources at hand.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Seriously these guys are cooked.
    With the current political climate in Russia their next project is probably a simulator of a Po-2 rear gunner single-handedly winning the battle of Berlin.
    Didn’t you know the Po-2 could outperform the Fw-190 comrade? It’s right here in these notes we have rediscovered!
    Can we really see these guys ever producing sims of western equipment in a vaguely realistic or sympathetic way?
    And their comms with their customers are worse than loathsome.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I hope they don’t go that far into the abyss and at the moment we just don’t know. We’ll find out whenever they do announce what they are working on… and then release it. Fortunately, we do have some options around so we’ll see how the next couple of years shake out.

      Like

  4. I’m optimistic for the series and encouraged by the fact that they seem to be excited about it. Given the average simmer’s impatient, nitpicky, and innate ability to be completely carried away by any morsel of news, I’m absolutely behind their communication strategy. Many times I have had to say “Just to keep you updated, we have no useful information to update you with at this time.” It’s a real thing and I appreciate the update! Plenty of other things to look forward to in the mean time.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I do think it’s good to provide regular updates even if not everything can be said. Let’s us know a bit and quiets some of the anxiety about the future.

      There is always hope!

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Why the silence about the new project, if it was for IL2-BoX only? I still think it’s simple: a new flysim game based on a new game engine that’s not compatible with the actual IL2-BoX game. If they would announce that new game direction, would you still buy IL2-Box products or wait for the new flysim?
    Are we not getting a RoF/BoX déjà vu here.

    Like

    1. It’s absolutely a new project. I do wish they had been less circumspect about that.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. The would not fall into the same trap as Jason did, leaving RoF and full focus to BoS. So if they going for something complete new, it will be a nieuw theatre of war and another period of time. Like a Middle east or Vietnam helicopter/jetgame . It seems the those jets in DCS are more popular then the WW2 stuff.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Cold War era is really picking up on the DCS side of things. It’s fascinating to have seen that transition happen.

        Like

  6. If this is a completely new sim, I wonder what will happen to IL-2 BoX; will it need a team of semi-volunteer devs like COD?

    Like

    1. I’m guessing it will go into maintenance mode like Rise of Flight.

      The sim is in a pretty good spot. It’s never going to be perfect but it’s got a good breadth of content now and on sale it offers tremendous value. It just won’t expand much past what we know about – though there may be a few surprises. We’ll see!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. They need to do better than that, like re-use the aircraft assets and charge only an “upgrade price” to bring them to the new engine.
        To completely start from scratch splits the community and at this stage of small community that means to kill the community. Charging full price to ROF owners for FC was reluctantly accepted because it’s niche, but nobody wants to complete their IL2 GB collection only to be told they have to start from scratch just to get a slightly newer engine.

        Like

      2. I don’t think it’ll be slightly newer. This has the sounds of being a big break from where things were.

        I understand and share your concerns. This is what I’m reading between the lines on.

        Like

  7. History is the substance to create another and better world

    Like

  8. I still think it may be the CBI…

    Like

  9. If BoX ends w/o there being a Yak-3 released for it… I quit! 😛

    Like

  10. SO MUCH Doom & Gloom around IL2 (and every. single. other. flight. sim…)!

    While we’d always like to have the notes from the Producer’s meetings, given the constantly overweening speculation of the flight sim community, I can hardly blame them for keeping many things under wraps.

    In regards to a “new platform”, it doesn’t make sense in that building a flight sim from scratch is such a gargantuan effort it would be utter folly to do so.
    By extension, why would they change what they have right now to the point where compatibility is utterly broken with the existing sim, when what they have is a very good product that many feel is the “goldilocks” of combat flight sims?

    Further, X-Plane, DCS World, Prepar3D, and MSFS 2024 are ALL built/building on their respective historical code bases. So it’s highly likely that there’s simply no reason “new” combat simulator won’t allow compatibility with the existing series.
    It’s also entirely possible that the “new” simulator will offer such a different milieu that it wouldn’t even make sense to have the same plane-sets available (such as Korean War or other post-ww2 conflicts).
    And finally, if the “new” simulator is indeed a quantum leap forward in feature-set, it might legitimately not make financial sense to upgrade the BoX series – for free.

    I mean, come-ON, guys – this is SOFTWARE, after all, and we need to realize that it’s always an expense and NEVER an “investment”.
    The value comes from the time spent enjoying it, after all.

    Right? Right. 🙂

    Like

  11. My small sympathy for them vanished with the message, not least because what Han subsequently said should have been included in the initial broadcast.

    The juxtaposition of having supposedly met the goal in expanding team, having decided on a new theatre BUT not being sure which time-frame for said new theatre nor having the confidence to admit anything about what it might contain is almost tailor-made to raise doubts and concerns.

    Which, unsurprisingly, it did.

    There is a middle ground here that they seem determined to miss. No one expects a ten-year forecast. No once expects a list of certain and fully-functioning features. About 75% of those interested are mature enough to accept there are goals that may or may not evolve into useable elements.

    They are on the back-foot. Retreating into a shell and allowing rumour to swirl is not a great idea.

    In case any of them peruse this – and for professional reasons they really should – can I recommend:

    – Announce the theatre with as much specific details as possible: It clearly at this point cannot be changed, so what have you got to lose?
    – Indicate your thinking on specifics of time and zone (fully mapped, basic mapped and so forth) and the reason for and against: there will be a debate, possibly antagonistic, but at least there is transparency
    – Likely aircraft, possibly aircraft and maybe-in-the-future aircraft: No one can hold you to account legally but it will generate interest, possibly even be a guide to the team’s priorities as to relative enthusiasm
    – List of the advances over BoX that your team is exploring: again, generate interest and debate

    Some people will always say ‘to hell with you, I’m done’ and some will be ecstatic with joy. if after 12 months they can change their minds on the next release I will be astonished. So formulate a careful briefing at least indicating the broadest possibly generalities. if there is still an internal debate, a poll might even be worthwhile.

    But say something useful. Admitting that 12 months of work and a decision on a theatre but uncertainty on the time-frame so QED we cannot tell you anything is just….wow.

    What’s that noise? Oh, it’s DCS and MSFS having your lunch.

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending