There’s a bit of a mystique around the four-engine A340 airliner. It wasn’t as popular as some of its competitors nor as popular as the A330, its close sibling, however, that has given the aircraft a bit of a cult following perhaps in part because it is rare to spot one. A couple of flight sim developers, iniBuilds among them, are looking to tap into that potential with the release of the first A340 for Microsoft Flight Simulator. It wouldn’t be a regular day in the community without a bit of controversy around a major release and this time its surroudning the A340’s release in the Marketplace exclusively. Let’s have a look at it all!

Four engines for the long haul

The A340-300 in both passenger and freighter variants is the focus of iniBuilds latest airliner release. The A340 comes packaged with iniBuilds usual array of features including high resolution textures, custom cabins, multiple available liveries, high fidelity sounds, custom coded FMS, MCDU, fly-by-wire model, electrical, hydraulic, cabin and environment simulation, as well a custom EFB, CPDLC via Hoppie, Navigraph and SimBrief support.

Some of the extra features include the ability to swap between EIS1 and EIS2 cockpit configurations – the earlier model sporting CRT screens and slower visual refresh rates relative to the LCD screens on the EIS2. The aircraft has visual wear and tear features, GPS jamming simulation, custom terrain radar, GSX integration, and it packs in iniBuolds autosave functionality too.

Marketplace release and other controversies

One of the more unusual pieces to this release is news that iniBuilds are releasing this product exclusively, at least for the first few months, through the Microsoft Flight Simulator Marketplace. That in itself isn’t terribly controversial, many products do release there exclusively, but its unusual for iniBuilds who has spent a significant amount of time building up their own iniManager software and iniBuilds storefront. Indeed, their two prior flagship airliner releases came out there and so news that this latest release wouldn’t show up there immediately has raised eyebrows.

Some users prefer to buy from third party storefronts for a variety of reasons ranging from supporting developers directly to hoping for quicker updates and releases relative to the Marketplace (which has been slow at times).

An iniBuilds forum moderator has provided a statement on the release citing piracy as to the reason why this is the case.

We appreciate the feedback and understand that some of you prefer purchasing products outside of the Marketplace.

For the A340, we’ve chosen to launch exclusively on the Microsoft Marketplace at this time. This decision is primarily driven by the need to protect our work against piracy, as the Marketplace offers the most robust safeguards currently available for high-value, complex aircraft projects.

We’ve experienced significant losses from piracy on recent releases, and ensuring the sustainability of our team and future developments is a top priority.

The update cycle is quick, as we have experienced in recent test builds, that if we submit on a Thursday its released the following Tuesday for example.

We have a patch update already planned for submission on release day so we do not see this being an issue.

Thank you for your support and understanding.

iniBuilds on the iniBuilds forum

At the moment, we don’t know when the A340-300 will release into the iniBuilds storefront so if you must have it right away, you’ll have to get it on the Marketplace.

The other piece of this puzzle will be the reception of the aircraft. Initial buzz for the A350 release gave way to months of frequent complaints in the community about WASM crashes interrupting flights and frame rate performance making the aircraft challenging to deal with. Will the A340 release manage to steer clear of those same complaints? We’ll have to wait and see.

The aircraft is also exclusively available for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 and you can buy it exclusively on the MSFS Marketplace for $59.99 USD.

Learn more about the product here on the iniBuilds website.


22 responses to “iniBuilds A340 has arrived plus Marketplace release controversy”

  1. Interesting. I never thought of/heard of using Marketplace exclusivity as an anti-piracy tool. Could be just an experiment.

    I’ve been unable to stick with any specific storefront strategy anyway. My purchases are strewn across the Marketplace, Contrail, Orbx, the Ini-store, and several independent websites. It’s a mess and a hassle to keep everything updated, but here I am.

    I’m surprised piracy that big of a problem in this industry. I mean I’m sure it exists, but are these the same people who drop hundreds on yokes, throttle quadrants, rudder pedals, and Navigraph subscriptions? I can’t see someone who’s going to just download a study level airliner illegally actually spending much quality time with it.

    At any rate, I hope it helps them and I hope the plane is successful. I love the A340. I’m actually going to hold out for the Aerosoft/Toliss one before buying one. Luckily I have plenty to keep me occupied while I wait.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
      ShamrockOneFive

      I’ve bounced around different storefronts myself. I tried to stick to a strategy with specific storefronts but then I keep adding on 🙂

      Very curious to see the Aerosoft/ToLiss response with their A340 rendition. It’ll be some good competition!

      Like

    2. These “losses by piracy” excuses are wearing off quite rapidly. There is absolutely no way they can know how/when/why they lost money from piracy. It’s all a guessing game and very close to the word “lie”. How can they know how many copies have been made from their software? It’s impossible.

      Also, using the marketplace to “avoid” piracy is a shot in the foot as most people simply hate buying in the marketplace. Now how can they quantify losses from that? Profit if any?

      Another point is that people who didn’t buy the 350 (they claim losses on this model) wouldn’t buy it in the marketplace anyway. People download pirated software because they’re either curious, some want to see how it works before even buying it (hint hint), some are just blatant pirates and some others just can’t afford it. Even then, not everyone who downloads an aircraft will actually use it – Some just download as a collector’s item and it lays there on the disk.

      So, all in all, whoever is honest like me and like most (hopefully), are the ones actually being harmed by all this “we lost money” nonsense. We have to deal with registration stuff from servers which fail too often, awkward purchase options such as “marketplaces” with major lag when updates are concerned, etc.

      Quit the BS IniBuilds, and be there for the users, find proper solutions for your software (cut down demo versions, lower prices, whatever) and stop hurting honest buyers with your excuses.

      Like

      1. I agree. I think Micro$oft paid them a lot of greenbacks to have exclusivity in the store for a certain period of time, similar to what Epic Games does with its store. Although, honestly, I don’t know what Micro$oft gains from this move. The piracy argument may well be true, but let’s be honest, at this point that excuse no longer holds water.

        It has been proven beyond doubt that most people who pirate a product would never buy it in the first place. They download it because they can use it without spending money. Otherwise, they would never buy it, so the old complaint that pirated downloads equal lost sales no longer works.

        Furthermore, I don’t see the point of pirating such complex add-ons that require continuous updates throughout most of their life cycle.

        Like

      2. Misguided maybe, but I really don’t see anything malicious here. Everyone knows MS gets a cut of Marketplace sales, so anyone who can sell their product directly would be better off doing so as much as possible, then Marketplace sales would just be an extra way to get more exposure.

        Inibuilds looks like they put a lot of thought and work into their manager software. They even made an airport (MKE) that you can get for free but only via their manager software. They also allow you to transfer Marketplace purchases over to your account with them, allowing you to get discounts on 2024 upgrades.

        You can tell they have a piracy concern though, because I have two PCs, and whenever I log into the manager on one PC to update my products, it logs me out of the other one. I actually wonder now if my doing that looks like possible piracy activity in their data analysis.

        At any rate, I agree with everyone here that a pirated copy is usually not a lost sale, and any publisher who looks at it as such is going to end up running in circles. I have my doubts as to whether the A340 being a Marketplace exclusive will really do much good (or harm) in the long run. I consider them a premium developer with a large range of quality products, but that occasionally have issues. If their product is good and it’s something I’d like to fly, I’ll buy it. I don’t care where.

        (but I sure wish I had an easy way to update all my 3rd party products at once!)

        Like

      3. Yeah, as far as piracy goes I don’t see how it’s physically possible to have a control to compare with, so I doubt they really know at all. Not that I’m condoning piracy, but it’s not the first time that piracy has been used as an excuse for something else.

        Like

  2. Inibuilds stated that they are aiming for a high degree of fidelity for their A340-300, which I hope it is in terms of flight model and systems modelling to the point where you could potentially use it on a pilot training flight simulator (though using MSFS for flight simulation centres in real life is very much outlawed – that (I think) is why P3D is still used). But I understand there are limitations to how much they can do for this project, and I understand that anything this detailed will cost probably hundreds of thousands of US dollars. So I understand if this is not going to be 100% accurate.

    Like

    1. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
      ShamrockOneFive

      I think we’ve had this conversation before but when it comes to fidelity there’s a careful balance between authenticity of experience, which we want, and development effort to make it close to 100% accurate (which you can’t do in simulation, it will always be off).

      In a practical sense I have no doubt this is a high fidelity experience.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Sorry about repeating myself. Won’t happen again.

        Like

      2. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
        ShamrockOneFive

        Not chastising but rather suggesting some broader definitions of what high fidelity and study level experiences are. I think sometimes we flight simmers think ‘more realistic’ is better but sometimes its a matter of diminishing returns.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. I see now. I guess I was a little vague.

        Like

      4. Beautiful plane the A340-300 is. I remeber flying on them with Cathay Pacific when I was a child, so making something I can learn to fly from my childhood means a lot to me.

        Liked by 1 person

      5. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
        ShamrockOneFive

        A solid personal connection is a great motivator if you’re looking to learn an airplane!

      6. Agreed.

        Like

    2. Yeah you can only get so “real” with a PC simulator. Even the full-motion ones I train in at work have a lot of things we need to pretend at. There are so many tiny little unrealistic things in MSFS, P3D, XP12 etc. that I think anyone who proclaims one as being the King of Realism is just splitting hairs and looking for validation.

      For me, if button does what button is supposed to do, if big airplane feels like a big airplane, and if engines make cool engine sounds, then for me it’s a realistic airliner sim. Most of my RL pilot friends who also sim mainly use MSFS, just because it’s easier to work with and has a broader scope, and it’s more “fun” (we like to have fun too!)

      The term “study level” gets used a lot. If I have to study something in order to fly it in the sim, or if I can effectively use it to help me study the real plane, that makes it study level to me! 😀

      Liked by 2 people

  3. I will say the visuals are stunning. God job on that, iniBuilds!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I’ve seen a few initial flight comments already and seems like it’s going well.

    I hope it’s smoother than the A350 launch!

    I support their de vision to go thru MP for anti piracy. Yes, there are delays in release, but it makes life so much more convenient.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
      ShamrockOneFive

      I hope it does go well! The A350 certainly had a protracted post launch development period that I don’t think people were ready for. The A340 will probably impress if it goes even slightly smoother.

      I’m certainly not opposed to their anti-piracy efforts. I guess the thing that’s surprising is that they’ve done so much to boost their own storefront and now there’s a bit of a question mark hanging over it if they aren’t feeling comfortable releasing their own flagship there. If Microsoft can solve some of their Marketplace issues then it may get further attention.

      Like

  5. Reinhard Eichler Avatar
    Reinhard Eichler

    With your extensive knownledge about the various freeware and payware modules for fs2024, can you recommend a good Boeing 727?

    Like

    1. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
      ShamrockOneFive

      There’s currently only one 727 available and that is the one from FlightSim Studio AG. They have passenger, freighter, and a new super configuration with a modernized cockpit. I haven’t tried it yet but the community seems to have generally positive things to say about it. It’s worth a look!

      Like

      1. Reinhard Eichler Avatar
        Reinhard Eichler

        I understand the modernized cockpit is optional? For that plane i’d lean to the old one but having both is even better.

        Do you plan on writing up a review on that plane?

        (Even if not, thanks for pointing me in the right direction 🙂 )

        Like

      2. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
        ShamrockOneFive

        Eventually yes. But it may be half a year before I get there. My next airliner focused review is PMDG’s 777 series. Coming very soon!

        Like

Leave a comment

Trending