After doing my Aeroplane Heaven C-47 review back several weeks ago it popped into my head that I hadn’t done something that I had promised to do a few years ago. Most of you probably won’t remember that I said anything about it but its something long simmering at the back of my head. I am pleased to be able to write a review on the Microsoft Flight Simulator iteration of the famous Junkers Ju52. Having spent a fair bit of time with the IL-2 Great Battles version, I was keen to visit this classic airplane and have a look at it in this sim as well. How is it to fly in MSFS these days? Is it still worth some time and money? Let’s review!

Keeping history alive

Its in the title of this review and I want to get to this point first before I write about any of the other items. The MSFS team have been very good at doing some historical legends and doing the work of at least some level of digital preservation while also making that work interactive and accessible to a wide variety of flight simmers. The Ju 52 fits into that category alongside many of the other types that they have covered and as I was doing my research into this module, I was a bit surprised to be reminded that this was the inaugural Local Legend – number 1!

I love that while we get to experience these aircraft in a simulator, they are also, in a sense, being digitally preserved. A lot of work has gone into making sure that this airplane represents a strong representation of the real world aircraft. Microsoft, Asobo, and the digital creator on the project, Oliver Moser, also worked with a Ju52 pilot and had access to one of the few surviving examples to help make this aircraft come alive. It’s not the only aircraft they partnered on also doing Local Legend 12: The Dornier Do X Flying Boat and Local Legend 6: Junkers F 13 among a few others.

As for the history of this aircraft, the Ju52’s history is quite a long and fascinating one. I’m just going to touch on a few items here. Though the aircraft undoubtedly has connections to WWII, the type has a history that extends to both before and after in a wide variety of roles all over the world.

Initially designed as a single engine aircraft, it was reconfigured as a tri-motor which had become popular at the time. The aircraft was intended to be an airliner for Deutsch Lufthansa and saw some use in the role, however, the type was pressed into military use by the Nazi regime despite the objections of Junkers company founder Hugo Junkers. Junkers, no doubt for his resistance, died under suspicious circumstances in 1935.

Thousands were built for the Luftwaffe and used in cargo transport, troop transport, airborne troop insertion, mine sweeping and more. Most of the several thousand produced were destroyed either in combat or demolished at the end of the war.

Fascinatingly, the Junkers 52 lived on post war! The type was produced in France as the Amiot AAC.1 Toucan and in Spain as the CASA 352. Several Ju52s are still in limited operation today.

Visuals and sounds

We’ve been through quite a few legendary aircraft over the years of MSFS development and release cycles. I’ve reviewed quite a few but I have to say that this one really stands out to me.

Getting the corrugated aircraft skin just right is awfully hard to do and as much as its possible I think the artists for this aircraft managed to make it look really good. The detailing around the engines, the cowling, the inner portions of the engines, the flaps (that move down and become a kind of double wing setup), the animated gear and tailwheel all show some very careful modeling and texture work! Everything feels crisp and clean!

That detailing extends to the interior of which there are two different cockpits with different art styles and instruments. Both are immaculately detailed. The cabin area looks great as well with beautiful detailing.

Being an earlier aircraft release for MSFS, I do find that there are some things that have gotten better. There’s no fire or smoke on engine start and the transition for the propeller animation from stopped to moving is lacklustre. That said, we’ve seen some recent releases with the same issues but I’m a little more forgiving of this older example.

The type comes with a bunch of liveries. As near as I can tell, none of them are historically accurate but are semi-historically inspired. MSFS has typically shied away from military liveries in most cases (with some exceptions) so this one is more aimed as the Ju52s civilian experience of which it had many. They also might’ve tried to do the JU Air HB-HOS in the pack as a real world modern flying example but maybe weren’t able to secure the licensing.

The sound work is generally good. Its not as impressive as something that you’d hear from a high end module but the engines are suitably good and the various buttons and levers in the cockpit have sounds even if I think they could be chunkier. Not bad overall though!

Flying the Ju52

My review of this module goes two ways when it comes to the flying character.

On the one hand, I’m generally impressed with the airplane in flight. It’s a gentle beast and it feels very familiar to me having flown the IL-2 model. Ailerons are generally responsive in most regimes of flight but the aircraft’s roll rate is ponderous. Elevators are reasonably effective in most scenarios but they do have their limits too. Turns can be very tight and hard movements on the rudder are quickly dampened down though not too quickly. In this regime of flight, the Ju52 feels pretty good and not too different from the IL-2 experience.

On the other hand, the type has been known to have some MSFS specific quirks. Lighten up the fuel load and take the 1939 model and you’ll soon see that the Ju52 can spring up into the air in an extremely short distance (less than 3 seconds of takeoff roll in my experience). Some combination of the limits of the MSFS flight model circa 2021 and weather and load mean that the type can do STOL takeoff like few others and it doesn’t quite seem right. The Ju52 is rated for a 500 meter / 1650 foot runway, however, this is far less than that. Furthermore, the IL-2 model, though capable of a short takeoff, displays no such quirk and I generally feel that it’s a better representation of the actual flight model. There are apparently some climb quirks in some situations too although I did not personally encounter them.

I’d love to see this aircraft get a once-over by the MSFS team. Maybe some CFD modeling and the enhancements from 2024 would sort out some of the quirks here. Will it happen? Doubtful but I can still wish!

The type does have an amphibious version and water handling is generally easy to master. Even at low throttle you can maneuver the aircraft around which is useful but its also probably a simplified experience. Still, its always a bit of fun to land on water when doing some flight sim adventures.

Systems and features

The Ju52 comes with a surprising amount of capability baked in depending on which cockpit variant you choose. There are two!

A classic version has 1939 style cockpit instruments. I’m very familiar with this one so everything was in its place and generally most features of the aircraft are functional although there’s no penalty for flying with the oil and radiator controls closed. Even if the gauge does show an overheat, nothing will happen. Its not that kind of sim experience although I wish it had some of that.

That aside, most things in the cockpit do work and the interactivity is really good overall. There are some useful concessions to making the aircraft functional in MSFS with a back panel, containing the lighting controls for the plane, growing a few extra buttons to enable you to open and close doors, add ground chocks, and add an access ladder for the passengers. I like this approach.

The classic version also has something of an autopilot onboard. Its more of a heading hold capability where you turn on the autopilot, dial the heading to the one you want to match, enable the hold and then the aircraft will gently (using the rudder only) try and hold the heading. Its not a modern AP system but something that is more of an assist. You can never really be hands off with the Ju52 even with this system on.

The modern retrofit is completely different in almost every way with its own set of controls and instruments. There’s a tablet that you can turn on and off with GPS functionality, a more modern DME display, VOR navigation, modern transponder and radio controls, and generally speaking you can operate this as you would any other GA or small airliner. Though this version is missing any sort of autopilot and lacking what even the classic version has. I’d have loved a functional autopilot here in the modern version.

The aesthetic is completely different for this version and I’m generally impressed that they went through the effort. Its not just a retrofit of a radio and a GPS the way I’m used to seeing in a lot of other aircraft but essentially an entirely different cockpit.

Final thoughts

I’m really glad I came back around to this aircraft. Flying the Ju52 in MSFS has a kind of soothing effect as nothing really happens very fast, its never really a stressful experience in any way, and the type is just so well behaved. You can definitely appreciate the lengths that the artists went to make the visuals on this too with an exterior and interior that really impressed me. It’s better than most of the other aircraft in its category that I’ve looked at.

On the downsides, you’ll find that the sounds are just ok and the flight model only sometimes feels like a Ju52. The extremely short takeoff capability was never really ever fixed and I suspect it never will be. Its frankly not a dealbreaker at this price point because more normal weights and flying conditions will result something approaching a realistic experience.

Flight model foibles aside, this project was clearly a labour of love. Something put together with knowledge and ability that doesn’t just appear if you’re doing it for a quick release. I do wish it had more but none of the Local Legends have ever been extremely deep offerings but rather a recreation that puts us into a piece of aviation history at a pretty reasonable price.

This aircraft is up for $14.99 USD in the Marketplace but is regularly on sale whenever they have a big marketplace sale. That makes it a pretty good buy if you want a historical aircraft to cruise around with. There’s just enough here with the different cockpits and systems plus the amphibious variant to make this a worthwhile purchase, even three years after release, if this type of historic aircraft interests you and some of the flight model quirks you can look past.

I’ve got a few more of these Local Legends I want to visit and review before MSFS 2020 heads off into the sunset. Not that they are going anywhere of course!

Screenshots


9 responses to “Going back to Local Legend 1! MSFS Ju52 aircraft review”

  1. Urgent Siesta Avatar
    Urgent Siesta

    Based on Asobo’s assertions, I’d be unpleasantly surprised if all of these aren’t brought forward to v2024, so I suspect you’ve got “some” time yet!

    Glad to see this review, you’re probably one of very few people on the planet with this type of practical experience 🙂

    It’s always a bit difficult to fall completely in love with most of the MSFS addons, particularly any that have distinctive flight models.

    OTOH, for the price, as you’ve said, it’s a steal of a deal on a significant piece of aviation history.

    FWIW, I never realized how many German aircraft designs continued in use / production after the war, as well as how pervasively their engineering fundamentals influenced post-war aerospace.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
      ShamrockOneFive

      Yeah it sounds very likely they will move over just fine. It’s more of a self imposed deadline because I want to write a retrospective on the sim and feature at least a few of these legends as part of it.

      It’s fun to jump back and forth between sims. It does give perspective!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I am not sure if I understood you correctly. Have you actually been at the controls of a real Ju? The DLH historic retrofit or the classic Ju-air one? I like this plane a lot, I have made two passenger flights in it – the Swiss one – but my experiences in the 2020 sim variant are not exacltly matching your comments.

        Take-off distance – I can get it to take off in 500 metres, but not any earlier. I have to load some passengers in the back to keep its tail from lifting when using the brakes. The model has a tendency for beginning to act up as soon as the tailwheel hits the runway. Can I apply the tailwheel fix to block the tailwheel and instead use differential power or braking for turns while taxiing? I did it on the DC-3, and it works perfectly.

        Another biiiig wish: Our Swiss Ju’s had modern instruments. The original as per MSFS are hard to read as they are all black. Our plane also had a GPS
        unit on the panel.

        Re the sound: As far as my decades-long first-person experience goes, the sim sound is quite good. Just turn up the volume.

        Like

      2. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
        ShamrockOneFive

        Hi Peter. I’m not sure I’m understanding your question in return but I will attempt. No, I haven’t flown a real Ju52. That’d be something that only a handful of folks can say in the modern age. I haven’t flown any of the aircraft I’ve reviewed so my reviews are focused on the flight simulation aspect of the experience in relation to other products.

        The short takeoff distance with the Ju52 is a well documented issue with the aircraft and most seem to agree that its an issue. It’s been mitigated by various core flight model updates. Tail wheels were not well supported early on – Carenado’s WYMF5 being the worst of the lot at launch and FlyingIron Simulations wrote their own tailwheel code to circumvent the issues. How it is now, versus when I wrote the review, may also be different. I haven’t flown it recently.

        Like

  2. Thank you for the review. I enjoyed the 1939 version a lot when it came out and even spent some time trying to set up the controllers for the quirky throttle levers differential braking mechanism. I recently read the memoirs of a pilot flying the Ju-52 in China in the 1930s and the difficulty of holding the route from Germany to China open in the increasingly toxic international situation. In the end they tried to set up a route via Kabul over the Pamirs to western China. The Ju-52 could only barely make it at a safe attitude through the Pamir-Hindu Kush passes.

    I join you in the hope for a revisit to this model. The FM and systems modelling could really do with an 2024 upgrade.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Now I want to go mess with the Ju52 again. The Ju52 is a legitimately a STOL aircraft, from a time before such designations were talked about. That 1100 ft number was for a fully loaded aircraft at MTOW. If you watch some of the actual airshow footage from in cockpits, they have a loaded plane typically around 50% fuel and full passenger compliment, grass strip, and the pilots don’t actually push the levers to full throttle (probably because you know, it’s old). I talked with a pilot last week at Oshkosh who flies the B25 and he said the old radials are always spooled up to well under the original manual power setting on take off to keep them running well. In this Ju52 video, it looks like 0.9 ata was max throttle used, and the RPM (U/min) was a bit over 1800 on one engine only, and the other two were actually a touch below 1800 (call it a 60C flex derate :). The aircraft, at load, got airborne from a grass strip in Germany that is only 3,143 ft long, and it was airborne pretty early, clearly well before the end of the runway. I counted 14 of the white markers from the approximate liftoff point visible once airborne. By my timing, it was about 18-20 seconds from the start of a slow, gradual push of the throttles to the chosen take off power setting to the point when the mains were off the ground. On a paved runway, if they pushed to actual full throttle, 2050 RPM, they’d likely move a good bit quicker.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utHyxKKg-xI

    Don’t get me wrong. I am not saying it’s accurate to take off in 3 seconds. This module was tuned before a lot of sim updates. We’ve seen how the Just Flight Hawk went from flying great to not so much, such that now they are now engaged in a flight model do-over, so things have probably changed with all the sim changes and improvements. The last update of the Ju52 I believe was in 2023. It definitely does not have the CFD, and lacks I believe prop physics updates and definitely does not have the newer ground handling stuff implemented from SU15. Somewhere I read that Moser was planning updates for all his aircraft but I can’t find that at the moment. Might have been something Jorg said in one of the many recent interviews. So I do think it will get some love again soon. 2024 also looks like it will have more improvements re: grass strips and basically all “non-paved” type conditions, so that could really make flying these older types and bush planes even more fun in the new sim. I would bet they will update them all for 2024 even just to add mission capability to those aircraft. The Cessna 207 for example is a potential sky diving platform, having a variant already modelled for example. Helos can be search and rescue, etc. Mission updates would give people who have not purchased them yet a potential reason to buy in the future. So fingers crossed!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
      ShamrockOneFive

      Great comments blanco! The three seconds to takeoff was definitely over the top but you’re right that it was a pretty short takeoff airplane so they are kind of in the right direction but just not at the fidelity that was required to get it a little closer to reality. Looking past that, it’s a very fun airplane to fly around. I’m going to spend some more time with it I think because its just so calming to fly!

      Very excited by the prospects of 2024 and I’d be overjoyed if Moser does come back to it and/or some of the other types that were done through 2020.

      Like

      1. I messed with the Ju52 tonight. So the big observation, at least compared to the video I had linked – the throttle setting for 0.9ata produced about 1950-2000 rpm, which was higher than obtained in the video by about 200 rpm. So the engines would make roughly 10% too much power compared to the video. I didn’t test wide open throttle. But I think this is the delta just really roughly. Unless the airshow one has like a different prop set up for whatever reason, but my suspicion is just that the various prop physics changes have altered the output of the engine/prop effectively and she needs to be fixed up.

        Like

    2. Are you talking of the Lufthansa-rebuild? I prefer our Swiss original BMW engined variant. I use the power (RPM) settings from the manual, and it says that you select only 1500 RPM for take-off.

      Like

Leave a reply to Peter Gloor Cancel reply

Trending