Work by the Airplane Simulation Company on their rendition of the C-130J Super Hercules has been taking place mostly in the background but today it has been revealed that the aircraft is heading towards release and, as is customary, a pre-order has begun. Let’s have a look!

Transport time

The Airplane Simulation Company has been working on the C-130J for a couple of years now. First revealed back in 2022 after months of rumours, the project has been quietly churning away in the background with the dev team making periodic check-ins on their Discord community.

Features for the DCS module include realistic cargo loading, aerial delivery, the MOAB, voiced checklist system, first person loadmaster, detailed systems simulation, multi-crew support, as well as detailed sounds and visuals and comprehensive documentation.

Some of the features that really jump out are, of course, the ability to deploy the GBU-43/B MOAB (aka the “Mother of all Bombs”) which is the largest non-nuclear weapon in the US’ arsenal. The shared cockpit environment is another interesting feature as is the reveal that a third multi-crew position (presumably the loadmaster?) is planned. Another point about the loadmaster position is the ability to walk around in the cargo area and outside the aircraft performing the duties related to the cargo system. Interesting stuff!

The team report that core features like the flight model, engines, APU, electrical, hydraulic, fuel, and avionics systems are all complete. So too is the multi-crew system for the pilot/co-pilot and the MOAB is already up and running. They are now turning attention to the LOD (level of detail) system, adding the third multi-crew, vehicle airdrop system (in partnership with Eagle Dynamics), and damage model.

Post launch plans

It sounds like C-130J will be a relatively complete experience on launch (time will tell of course) but the team do have an interesting post-launch plan. They report that they will then turn around and develop the MC-130J. Here’s a little of what they had to say about it:

This variant, operated by AFSOC, brings aerial refueling capabilities, including player-to-player AAR in multiplayer. The MC variant also includes the AN/AAS-52(V) EO-IR pod, and a third crew station for the CSO, or combat systems officer.

All of that should be quite interesting. The request for a flyable aerial refuelling platform has been mentioned more than a few times so actually confirming it as a planned feature is exciting.

Pre-order options

The pre-order is now live on the Eagle Dynamics e-shop as you’d expect it to be with the introductory pre-order price of $55.99 USD (regular $79.99 USD). You can also pre-order directly from Airplane Simulation Company for the same price or converted to your local currency.

Read more about the launch here!


26 responses to “DCS: C-130J pre-purchase begins!”

  1. Good luck to the devs with the launch! It’s cool to see 3rd parties stretching the platform and doing something new. I am struggling to see a lot of compelling gameplay with this airframe, but hopefully thats just my ignorance talking.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I think it just depends on what kind of game play interests you.

      I for one simply look forward to being able to run a Full Fidelity fixed-wing logistics mission in something more compelling than the TF-51, or the quite dated UH-1/Mi-8 default choices.

      The IRL Herc is really a Swiss Army Knife that has done and continues to do amazing & daring missions that the typical DCSW fighter simply isnt capable of.

      I’m not at all saying it’s going to replace my Hornet, or Hind, but it sure will be nice to have a significantly different option and genuinely new challenges to explore.

      Like

  2. It’s not something I thought I would be interested in, but those trailers can make any plane look cool. Will probably pick it up eventually.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
      ShamrockOneFive

      The trailer was absolutely excellent!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Awesome.

    However…

    When Nick decides to sell some of his warbirds to pay Razbam what they are owed so we can keep our modules, then DCS purchases will resume.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I just traded in my StrEagle for the pending Fulcrum.

      The other RB modules I have will live on in a separate v2.9 install (whichever release coincides with the final RB software patch).

      Like

  4. Looking forward to the C-130 big time. Day one purchase for me.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
      ShamrockOneFive

      Should be a good one from the looks of it! I like how we’ve got an RCAF livery right from day one!

      Liked by 1 person

  5. I wonder how long the Airplane Simulation Company will be working on their C-130J post release?

    Also, I wonder if they what aircraft they will do next once they are able to do so? I guess the answer has yet to be determined, but it is fun to speculate. Maybe they will do another airlifter, like the C-5 or C-17 maybe, or they could do a fighter plane as there is a long list to choose from.

    Like

    1. We know we’re getting the MC-130 which can do AAR after early access. It appears they’ll consider doing the AC-130 depending on how well the current one sells. Dunno about after that.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Thanks for the information. I’m sure their C-130J module will do fine.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
        ShamrockOneFive

        The gunship version would be interesting to see!

        Liked by 1 person

    2. Check out the ASC interview on YouTube by Enigma. Well worth the time.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thanks mate.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Does it have a working co pilot and engineer? Unsure how it would get off the ground otherwise.

    and a salty/sweary loadie.

    giving dcs the swerve for a while until whatever they are going through crystallises.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
      ShamrockOneFive

      I’ve spent the last two years learning airliners in X-Plane and MSFS and it’s no problem. Having the copilot helps from a workload and safety perspective in the real world, but you can absolutely get off the ground without one. Nothing different with the C-130.

      Hopefully some personality is involved with the loadmaster. ☺️

      Liked by 4 people

    2. Same way all the other 2-crew modules do.

      Like

  7. Outside of flying around, what purpose would this module serve in DCS? Don’t say logistics because there is no such thing in DCS and without a dynamic campaign logistics would just be make believe anyway.

    Like

    1. ShamrockOneFive Avatar
      ShamrockOneFive

      Important to acknowledge that Eagle Dynamics have still not really delivered on a full logistics system native to DCS World. You’re right about that. We’re still waiting.

      It sounds like the module is meant to ship with some missions to fly (hopefully more than what ED shipped with the CH-47). That will help certainly.

      Ultimately, however, I can see the best short term experience still being logistics in multiplayer scenarios (I said logistics! :)). This is not a new thing and the support is already in place. I’ve done these kinds of missions with the UH-1/Mi-8, I’m intending to do some with the C-47, and the C-130 could be used in this role as well.

      Lots of servers have support for logistics with cargo load and offload which then influences the rest of the ongoing scenario. A lot of these flights have been helicopter focused to-date but some of them have been using scripted C-130 flights. Now players can do them.

      Liked by 1 person

    2. So if it’s not a 1:1 representation of IRL then there’s no point in flying at all…?

      Better delete the game from your hard drive then, because none of it is like IRL.

      Like

      1. I’m not sure why you chose to respond in such a childish way. Personally, I don’t see the appeal of this module in an air combat simulator. If I wanted to fly something like this, I’d probably go with MSFS where the civilian experience offers more depth. In DCS, its lack of simulated combat systems doesn’t add much value for me.

        If this is something you enjoy, that’s totally fine—more power to you. But mocking others for having a different opinion is exactly the kind of behavior that pushes people away from DCS. And when the community shrinks, the likelihood of fewer new modules becomes a very real concern.

        Like

    3. I also wonder how this actually will be used in DCS. DCS as of today doesn’t even have correct and complete navigation systems. Stand alone DMEs don’t work there, and never have. Stand alone DMEs (DME/DME) are bread and butter for modern aircraft navigation. Planning and navigating large distances is a major part of all transport planes, as it is with airlines. There’s also the issue of the maps being too small (way too small) for lots of use cases for this aircraft.

      Nevertheless, the C-130 is one of the more interesting aircraft to come to DCS in years, so the potential is definitely here. I’m sure going to get it 🙂 even though I’m positively convinced that X-Plane or MSFS will be ahead for some time yet, giving this kind of aircraft a realistic playing field and realistic operation.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. What…?

        TACAN is DME and works as expected. IIRC, there are a few VORTACs on a couple of the maps, too.

        IDK about ICAO waypoint flight plans, but IIRC, the CH-47 can already handle those to some degree.

        Further, the Herc is a TACTICAL airlifter – which means it spends a great deal of it’s time in-theatre running short hops, or other tactical flights where the nav is very much like we have with the tactical jets. There’s plenty of IRL historical examples from which to model flights.

        Looking at the Herc as though it’s an airliner is certainly short-changing the types of missions that it does IRL and will be able to do in DCSW.

        Like

    4. I’m not mocking you, I’m pointing out what I believe to be a standards inconsistency in your stated position.

      There is a good deal of logistics working already in DCSW – I’ve spent hours and hours online in MP servers doing Helo logi work.

      This will fill a gap where we don’t have to do ridiculous things like fly a TF-51 or C-101 to deliver cargo 2-3x faster than helos can.

      Further, ASC stated in their interview video with Enigma that the module is extremely high fidelity to the point where it could reasonably be used for IRL training. Even if that’s not exactly true (I wouldn’t know), having a Full Fidelity cargo plane to run these cargo missions in a technically accurate manner will be a worthwhile expansion of game play.

      In re flying these kinds of “missions” in MSFS, sure that’s a thing. But MSFS surely has no logistics of ANY kind. So though I have and enjoy BBS’ Herc there, it’s really not any different than being a REALLY slow airliner.

      Finally, I’m relatively confident the flight model of the DCSW version will be better as per usual), and make the incredibly varied mission types the IRL Herc runs all the more enjoyable.

      Like

  8. I know this is gonna be very similar to the CH-47 for me, though I’ll probably get more use out of the Herc.

    But no way am I going to skip it – too much new stuff to do!

    Like

  9. I was wondering if I should bother. I requested a refund for the Strike Eagle, which I’ve barely flown since the ‘trouble’ started, waiting for a resolution before I learned the module. But last week, I heard that there will be no resolution. To my surprise, I was given a store credit immediately with no questions asked.

    So I’ve gone ahead with the pre-order! I loved the mod, I expect I’ll enjoy the full-fat module. Time will tell.

    Like

Leave a reply to Bumfluff Cancel reply

Trending